CGFM Practice Test Questions

115 Questions


The scope of a single audit engagement includes all of the following EXCEPT


A. financial statements.


B. internal controls.


C. performance results.


D. compliance with terms of the award.





C.
  performance results.

What is the basis for determining materiality for financial audits?


A. The auditee determines what is material based on their understanding of how the financial statements may be used by third parties.


B. The auditor establishes materiality based on whether a misstatement would influence the judgement made by a reasonable user of the financial statements.


C. The entity's main provider of resources typically sets materiality levels for financial reporting.


D. The auditor sets a standard percentage for all entities by transaction class.





B.
  The auditor establishes materiality based on whether a misstatement would influence the judgement made by a reasonable user of the financial statements.

A township wants to buy a new piece of equipment that will reduce costs by $20,550 at the end of year 2. If the township could invest its funds at a rate of 10%, what is the most the township should spend now to get the return it desires?


A. $16,440


B. $16,983


C. $18,495


D. $20,550





B.
  $16,983

Explanation: What Are We Solving For?
We are calculating thepresent value (PV)of $20,550 to be received at theend of year 2using a discount rate of10%.
The formula for present value is: PV=FV(1+r)nPV = \frac{FV}{(1 + r)^n}PV=(1+r)nFV Where:
Calculation:
PV=20,550(1+0.10)2PV = \frac{20,550}{(1 + 0.10)^2}PV=(1+0.10)220,550
PV=20,550(1.10)2PV = \frac{20,550}{(1.10)^2}PV=(1.10)220,550 PV=20,5501.21PV =
\frac{20,550}{1.21}PV=1.2120,550 PV16,983PV 16,983PV16,983
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
A. $16,440:Results from incorrect discounting for one year instead of two.
C. $18,495:Results from applying a lower discount rate or an incorrect formula.
D. $20,550:This is the future value, not the present value.

A local government is reviewing the performance of a contractor that is collecting trash for the county. Performance can be measured based upon the cost


A. per mile travelled.


B. per ton of trash collected.


C. comparison with closest comparable jurisdiction.


D. per employee.





B.
  per ton of trash collected.

Explanation: Why Measure Performance Based on Cost per Ton of Trash Collected?
Cost per ton of trash collected is a direct, objective, and quantifiable measure of the contractor’s performance. It reflects how efficiently the contractor is operating relative to the amount of trash being managed.
This measure aligns with the principle of output-based performance evaluation, which focuses on results (e.g., tons of trash collected) rather than inputs or unrelated factors.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
A. Per mile traveled: Mileage is not directly tied to performance; it depends on the route structure and geography, not the quantity of trash collected.
C. Comparison with closest comparable jurisdiction: While this may provide context, it is not a specific performance measure.
D. Per employee: Employee count does not directly measure performance or efficiency in trash collection operations.

The ratios used to determine an organization's ability to meet its creditor's demands are


A. budgetary cushion ratios.


B. liquidity ratios.


C. debt burden ratios.


D. turnover ratios.





B.
  liquidity ratios.

Explanation:


What Are Liquidity Ratios?

Liquidity ratios are financial metrics used to measure an organization’s ability to meet its short-term financial obligations as they come due. These ratios assess whether the organization has sufficient liquid assets (like cash, receivables, or short-term investments) to cover its current liabilities (debts or obligations due within a year).

Why Are They Relevant to Creditors?
Creditors care deeply about an entity's ability to repay its debts in a timely manner. Liquidity ratios provide a snapshot of the organization's financial health and give insight into its capacity to meet short-term demands. They are essential tools in evaluating whether a government entity (federal, state, or local) or any other organization can pay its creditors without needing to secure additional financing or liquidate long-term assets.

Common Liquidity Ratios: The most commonly used liquidity ratios are:
  • Current Ratio: This measures the organization’s ability to pay off its current liabilities with current assets. Formula: Current Assets ÷ Current Liabilities
  • Quick Ratio (Acid-Test Ratio): A stricter version of the current ratio, it excludes less liquid assets (like inventory) to assess the organization’s immediate ability to pay short-term debts. Formula: (Current Assets - Inventory) ÷ Current Liabilities
  • Cash Ratio: Focuses only on the most liquid assets, such as cash and cash equivalents. Formula: Cash + Cash Equivalents ÷ Current Liabilities
How Do Liquidity Ratios Apply to Governmental Accounting?
In governmental accounting, liquidity ratios are crucial for determining whether a governmental entity has the financial flexibility to manage short-term obligations like accounts payable, payroll, and other operating costs. For example:
  • State and local governments use liquidity ratios to show stakeholders their ability to sustain operations without financial strain.
  • Government-wide financial statements (under GASB standards) often emphasize liquidity to demonstrate fiscal health to bondholders and credit rating agencies.

Why Not Other Ratios?
  • A. Budgetary Cushion Ratios: These focus on the organization’s ability to withstand revenue shortfalls and maintain budgetary reserves, not specifically on meeting creditor demands.
  • C. Debt Burden Ratios: These measure the overall burden of debt on the organization but don’t directly address short-term liquidity or solvency.
  • D. Turnover Ratios: These evaluate operational efficiency (e.g., how quickly assets like inventory are converted into revenue), which doesn’t directly relate to creditor demands.

References and Documents:
  • Government Financial Manager (GFM) Competency Framework by the Association of Government Accountants (AGA): Section on “Financial Analysis” emphasizes the importance of liquidity ratios in assessing short-term solvency for government entities.
  • GASB Concepts Statement No. 1: Discusses the need for governmental financial reporting to provide information on financial condition, including short-term liquidity.
  • AGA Performance Management Framework Guide (2023): Highlights liquidity ratios as critical tools for demonstrating fiscal responsibility and transparency in public sector financial management.

Which of the following disbursement techniques can be used to ensure timely payments?


A. warrants


B. checks


C. drafts


D. bank cards





C.
  drafts

Explanation:
What Are Disbursement Techniques?
Disbursement techniques refer to the methods used by organizations to pay vendors or settle financial obligations. The timeliness of payments depends on the technique used.
Why Are Drafts the Best Option for Timely Payments?
Adraftis a payment instrument issued by an organization’s bank, drawn against its account, and typically includes specific payment timing instructions. Drafts allow the payer to specify the timing of payments, ensuring they are made on time.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
A. Warrants: Warrants authorize payments but do not ensure timeliness as they require additional processing before funds are disbursed.
B. Checks: Checks rely on postal delivery and clearing times, which may delay payments.
D. Bank cards: While convenient, bank cards are typically used for immediate payments, not for ensuring future timely disbursements.

In addition to the Yellow Book, which group's external audit standards can the GAO reference?


A. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board


B. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board.


C. International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions


D. AICPA





C.
  International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions

Explanation:
GAO and External Audit Standards: The Government Accountability Office (GAO) uses the Yellow Book as its primary standard. However, it may also reference external standards from recognized international and professional auditing organizations. INTOSAI is specifically mentioned in the Yellow Book as a source of additional standards for governmental audits.

The first step in the internal control evaluation process is


A. identifying the effectiveness of management activities.


B. assessing the adequacy of controls.


C. documenting how transactions of events are processed.


D. identifying potential risks.





D.
  identifying potential risks.

Explanation: What Is Internal Control Evaluation? Internal control evaluation is the process of assessing an organization’s internal controls to ensure they are adequate and effective in mitigating risks, ensuring compliance, and achieving objectives.
Why Is Identifying Potential Risks the First Step?
The entire purpose of internal controls is to mitigate risks. Therefore, before evaluating the controls, you need to identify the risks they are meant to address.
Once risks are identified, the organization can evaluate whether the existing controls are adequate and effective in mitigating those risks.
This approach aligns with risk-based frameworks like the COSO Internal Control Framework, which emphasizes risk identification as the foundation for effective controls.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
A. Identifying the effectiveness of management activities: This is part of control evaluation but occurs after risks and controls are identified.
B. Assessing the adequacy of controls: Controls cannot be assessed until the risks they address are identified.
C. Documenting how transactions or events are processed: While this step is important, it comes later in the process, after risks and controls are identified.

Internal control over financial reporting means that management can reasonably make which of the following assertions?


A. Sufficient spending authority and financial resources exist to support reported expenditures.


B. A physical inventory has been conducted of all assets meeting the jurisdiction's capitalization threshold.


C. All assets and liabilities have been properly valued and, where applicable, all costs have been properly allocated.


D. Management has met its legislatively directed program goals.





C.
  All assets and liabilities have been properly valued and, where applicable, all costs have been properly allocated.

Explanation: What Is Internal Control Over Financial Reporting?
Internal control over financial reporting (ICFR) ensures the reliability of an entity’s financial statements. It focuses on maintaining accurate, complete, and properly valued financial information that complies with accounting standards and meets the needs of users.
Why Is Option C Correct?
Proper valuation of assets and liabilities is a critical component of ICFR. It ensures that financial statements fairly represent the entity's financial position.
Cost allocation is also essential where applicable, such as assigning costs to programs or projects.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
A. Sufficient spending authority and financial resources exist: This relates to budgetary control, not financial reporting.
B. Physical inventory of capitalized assets: Conducting a physical inventory is part of asset management, not financial reporting assertions.
D. Legislatively directed program goals: Meeting program goals is related to performance reporting, not ICFR.

The basic steps in fraud audits include all of the following EXCEPT


A. consulting legal counsel.


B. reporting the results.


C. follow-up on control weaknesses.


D. considering political ramifications.





D.
  considering political ramifications.

Explanation:
Fraud Audit Objective: Fraud audits aim to detect and investigate fraudulent activities, strengthen internal controls, and report findings to stakeholders.

A program manager at a local agency needs to understand if program participation varies significantly from enrollment. The information changes daily. The best way to quickly analyze this would be to use


A. crosstab.


B. portable document format.


C. text file.


D. dashboard





D.
  dashboard

One of the five components of COSO ERM is


A. performance.


B. changing environment.


C. complex calculations.


D. accepting risk





A.
  performance.

Explanation: What Is COSO ERM?
The COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework is a widely accepted framework that helps organizations identify, assess, and manage risks while creating value. The five components of COSO ERM are:

  • Governance and Culture
  • Strategy and Objective-Setting
  • Performance
  • Review and Revision
  • Information, Communication, and Reporting
Why Is Performance a Key Component?
ThePerformancecomponent focuses on identifying, assessing, and prioritizing risks to achieving an organization’s objectives. It includes implementing risk responses (e.g., avoiding, reducing, sharing, or accepting risks) and monitoring their effectiveness.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
B. Changing Environment: This is not a COSO ERM component but a general factor influencing risk management.
C. Complex Calculations: This is not relevant to COSO ERM.
D. Accepting Risk: While accepting risk is part of risk responses, it is not one of the five COSO ERM components.


Page 3 out of 10 Pages
Previous